But could it have the same effect on what people think about the world that frames the characters and complexity – the world of marketing? As consumers become bored with traditional advertising techniques, brands evolve by producing more entertaining, interactive, and insightful campaigns, so consumers can’t help but enjoy the creativity and innovation in content. However, they’re still wary of advertising claims, believing that brands are more interested in bolstering sales than providing consumers with products to benefit their lives.

Much like Mad Men’s uncanny ability to change culture through its poignant human insights, the show could be beneficial to the public’s perception of marketing as well. In “The Wheel,” the final episode of the first season, Don Draper pitches an idea for a slide projector to prospective clients at Kodak, who made it clear that they’re interested in running with an ad theme of technological advancement in their new product. However, by putting his personal photographs onto the projector, tainted by the heartbreak of his inner turmoil and crumbling family life, Draper effectively shows the clients at Kodak, and the viewer, that marketing is not about shiny new things. It’s about human insights, the personal relationship people have with certain products, and the opportunities brands have to capture the memories and emotions that surround human relationships.

It could just be that, with Mad Men’s gaining popularity and the growing interest in advertising (The Pitch, a new reality show centered on agencies pitching marketing ideas to brands, was hatched to strategically bask in Mad Men’s glow), the show has the power to change consumer culture’s suspicion of marketers. With a carefully-curated storyline, consumers now have an insight into Don Draper’s perspective that campaigns are made by humans for humans, with complexity and emotion both delivering and receiving each message.

Recently hitting 10 million unique monthly views faster than any standalone site in US history, Pinterest is becoming too big to ignore, especially for brands and marketers. Curious about what this site is and how to utilize it? Check out our new Potty Posting, which takes a look at how brands can use this site to “pinspire” consumer action.

The Ego to Her Id

Do you often find yourself planning a hypothetical wedding, decorating a hypothetical house, or building a hypothetical shoe closet out of items you probably can’t afford?

If so, you might have a Pinterest problem.

At least you’re not alone. Apologies in advance to anyone who’s already familiar with it, but Pinterest is a social media site for users to gather, organize and share things they find on the Internet in a visually-stimulating, digital scrapbook. With over 11 million unique monthly visitors in January and referral traffic equaling that of Google and Twitter, it’s gaining a lot of attention.

“NOOOOOOO!” you exclaim in a fit of rage. “I can’t keep track of all these stupid social networks anymore! What makes this one different?!” Geez, calm down.  Have some pins to help you relax.

A user’s Pinterest boards, or categories in which she “pins” items, are filled with inspirational quotes, entertainment ideas, parenting tips, recipes, decorating palettes, and everything else she can relate to. Even if the user doesn’t have the time, money, or energy to achieve or own all of the cool things she pins, she can still customize her scrapbook so that it becomes a visual representation of her ideal self, or what she would do if she could. Essentially, Pinterest is the organizing, rational helper to her passionate, impulsive instincts – the ego to her id.

In this way, Pinterest is the perfect platform for brands to connect with users. Whether they realize it or not, brands and marketers have been tapping in to the id and ego for decades, convincing consumers to satisfy their impulses by rationalizing those choices for them. That’s why brands have really started taking notice of this new platform. Some active brands on Pinterest, like Chobani yogurt and Gap clothing, post photos of recipe ideas and clothing combos (respectively) to allow users to save the brand as a “maybe someday” wish, without the immediate commitment to buy.

And when these brands trigger her lustful impulse to pin their attractive or delicious products, she shares it with the entire Pinterest community (there are no privacy settings on boards yet), and it guarantees that she’ll recognize it and be more likely to purchase it when she sees it in real life. Plus, on Pinterest, brand content doesn’t come in the form of a sponsored story or a traditional ad – it’s mostly re-pins from other users, which is, essentially, a recommendation of that brand by other community members. This recommendation is invaluable, because every marketer knows that people trust friends and virtual strangers more than advertising.

There’s only one problem: brands have to make it seem like they’re not selling anything. This is easy when it’s other users re-pinning a brand’s content, but with the ability for brands to create their own profiles and boards, the directness of the brand’s self-promotion could make users wary. A user’s boards are really personal – they’re an open exhibition of her philosophies, goals, dreams, and lifestyle. This puts brands at a disadvantage: a Pinterest user is not going to respond very well to impersonal ads and marketing messages taking advantage of the personal information she shares on her boards and cluttering up her ideal-self-collage.

This makes it necessary for brands to use Pinterest’s platform, and the nature of a user’s impulsive id, to do the marketing for them. On Pinterest, images take center stage, so brands should focus on eye-catching photos of their products to encourage re-pinning. Descriptions should be kept short and sweet, with just enough information to warrant a click. An important but often overlooked rule of thumb is to make sure pins are added to the right boards; if a brand offers a great product for a user browsing a “Midnight Snack” board, it’ll be a perfect match.

In addition, since Pinterest doesn’t have an established revenue plan, brands can leverage this user-driven community for creative advertising. For example, Corona could host a “Pin Your Beach” contest based on its “Find Your Beach” campaign, in which users pin images of their perfect getaway and win prizes. Her re-pinning the image, and the next user re-pinning it from her, will ensure a degree of separation that still brings a brand’s image to a user’s board, but without the directness of something that could be considered an advertisement.

The opportunities Pinterest offers brands is enormous, and by getting savvy to the platform and inspiring action in re-pinning, a brand can target a user’s impulsive instincts and ensure its place on her ideal-self-collage.

The argument for permanent change is that frugality is the new reality, as people turn their backs on conspicuous consumption. Many pundits link this ‘new attitude’ to popular support for the Occupy Movement, which is seeking to replace consumerism with a more utopian society. Very idealistic but as far as there being a long-term shift in consumer sentiment, forget it.

Yes there’s a mountain of data to show I’m wrong. Only yesterday I read a shopper study from a well respected research group, which described the consumer’s new and apparently permanent mindset: designer purses, high-end cosmetics, high-end jewelry, maid service, facials, new jeans and new shoes, to name but a few ‘expendables’ are all out. Other media reports even tell us the recession has a silver lining, either because it’s a ‘teaching moment’ on family finance or because it has freed people from the treadmill of spending.

Now I don’t dispute the recession has had a terrible impact; nor do I challenge that much discretionary spending is way down, just as coupon use and spending in the Dollar Channel is way up. My argument is this behavior is caused simply by a lack of cash and not by any cultural shift.

But wait I hear you cry, what about the explosion in bargain hunting? What about the success of Chicago’s own Groupon? Or Rue La La? Surely that’s a behavior that will stay? Yes, but then haven’t Americans always loved a bargain? The 1980s and 90s saw the rise of Walmart, feeding consumers’ desire for “everyday low prices.” People have always lined up outside stores with big sales: last Thanksgiving it was Walmart and Best Buy. 30 years ago it was Sears and Marshall Fields. While today’s shoppers are better informed, I don’t believe they’re any more bargain hungry than earlier generations.

In any case, my point here isn’t that people won’t carry on looking for deals; it’s that even after the worse recession since the 1930s, their emotional drive to shop for things that make them feel good remains a strong as ever. Sure actual spending has dipped because the money dried up but that visceral desire to consume remains. And if I’m right, brands that tap into that pent up demand will do far better than those who behave in line with the ‘conventional wisdom’.

For support of my thesis, look at Gfk Roper’s latest Annual Perspective. Gfk Roper asks some smart questions that give a better glimpse into people’s minds than most polling.

First, over the last 3 years the percentage agreeing with the statement “I am really turned off by people’s obsession with material possessions today” has declined, from 67% to 61% for the whole population, and from 67% to 55% for those earning over $100k.

Then take a look at this Gfk Roper chart, showing the percentage of people who agree with the statement “I like to buy prestigious brand names.”

What hits me about this chart is that it clearly shows that what I’m talking about isn’t restricted to the very rich, but is shared by many middle-income households.

On a more anecdotal level, think about the current success of glitzy brands like Audi, BMW, Mercedes and even Detroit’s own Cadillac. And to judge from the crowds at this year’s Chicago Auto Show, the appeal of these high-end brands is pretty universal: their stands were far busier than Ford or Chevy. Sure most people were probably fantasizing but that’s my point: the desire for brands with style and cachet still outweighs the appeal of more worthy options like the Toyota Prius and Chevy Volt.

Finally, talking of cars leads me to the Mercedes-Benz sponsored New York Fashion Week, on as I write. The coolest aspect of fashion today isn’t the on-going success of couture classics like Chanel and Armani (nor even Marc Jacobs’ simply marvelous hats shown above), but the spread of designer labels into the real world. Olivier Theyskens at Theory, Marni at H&M and Mizrahi at Target are all brilliant examples of hip designers and savvy retailers tapping into consumers’ desire to wear a ‘designer piece’, albeit at a relatively affordable price.

My point is not that consumers aren’t hurting, they are. My point is that despite the last few years, people still yearn for possessions that truly make them feel good, be that a killer pair of Louboutins, a new Audi or a bottle of 20 year old Elijah Craig Single Barrel bourbon at over $150 a pop. And as times improve, people will go back to their old ways (check out this recent CNN article on consumer spending.)

I’d add that even if it takes years for the economy to fully recover (sadly that’s the consensus of most economists), people are going to find ways to spend on what they really love, even if it means shopping at Dollar stores for everything else. What they will not do is stop being consumers, in the full-up capitalist sense of the world.

The take-away for marketing people is that you need to think very carefully how to tap into today’s Zeitgeist or spirit of the times. Do you stick with the conventional wisdom and try to connect with the ‘frugal’ consumer mindset? Or with the consumer who really can’t wait to indulge in some spending again? My money is on the later but what do you think? And if you disagree with my argument let’s have a debate. Post your thoughts. Start a conversation. It’s what blogs are for.

Many hotels are already offering experience-based rewards in their loyalty programs and enhanced concierge services to assist guests with discovering the world outside of the hotel. Instead of stockpiling points for a free night’s stay, members of these programs can earn cultural activities, like going backstage before a performance at the Peking Opera or spending the day with a professional bullfighter. Some loyalty programs even offer express experiences specifically designed for business travelers who may only have an hour or two to spare but who still want to go home with at least one memorable insight into the destination they visited.

Additionally, several startups have recently emerged to meet the wanderlusty needs of travelers by offering trip curation tools, local knowledge and a much-needed dose of personalization to the online trip planning process.

Launched in April, Vayable connects travelers with tour guides offering unique and intimate local experiences, like scouting Montmartre street art in Paris or visiting sample sales in NYC with a fashion insider. By allowing these independent guides to sell their local knowledge, Vayable is redefining the tour and activity segment of the travel market.

And then there’s Fortnighter, also launched this year, which provides (for a fee) made-to-order itineraries from professional travel writers based on the user’s dates of travel, interests and budget. Fortnighter brings currency, personalization and expert knowledge to the travel planning table and allows users to steer clear of the unreliability of algorithms and user reviews.

A slew of other services have also cropped up recently. All of this suggests that the travel experience marketplace is heating up, and there appears to be room for more. When looking across the dreaming, researching, booking, experiencing and sharing travel cycle, what kind of product or service can you offer that will assist travelers with collecting those sought-after experiences? How do you evoke the moments that inspire us when we travel? How do you help deliver more authentic travel experiences?

The invitation-only site has taken the creative world by storm. It’s given users access to a seemingly endless world of “pins” that can be saved on their own categorized pinboards and titled however they see fit. See a recipe on a blog that you want to make for dinner next weekend? Pin it to your “foodie” board. When you click on it later you’ll be taken back to the original recipe. Planning a wedding and trying to find the perfect bouquet inspiration? Do a search for flowers and pin photos of gorgeous bouquets to your little heart’s desire on your “tie the knot” board. See a quotation that makes you laugh, cry or think of a friend? Pin it!

Silbermann and his co-founders took the visual bookmarking to another level. Users may “follow” friends (and strangers), and comment on each other’s posts, much like on other social networking sites. Facebook users may also recognize the “like” button on Pinterest, while Twitterers can use their beloved hashtags in their pin captions. A recently updated iPhone app and brand-new mobile capabilities for other smartphones make for easy pinning on the go. In other words, the idea that inspiration is all around us has been “pinned” down, and you can quite literally take it with you wherever you go.

As Pinterest continues to grow, brands are taking note and jumping on the pinningwagon too. The popular home goods retailer West Elm uses the site to pin not only their own catalog of products, but other inspirational images as well. From there, followers can click on or repin images that link to the West Elm website where visitors can easily purchase. It’s that simple!

Go ahead. Request an invitation here. And start pinning!

Pros. The high demand created exponential word of mouth for the promotion. Created new news for the brand. Most likely, brought in new consumers that might not already shop there. And, sold out in record time. All great for a return on investment.

Cons. Frustrated shoppers that didn’t get the offer or product. Loss of other (non-promotion) sales during the downtime. Possible negative brand image impact.

In these two promotions (Missoni at Target and Whole Foods on LivingSocial), I’m convinced the pros outweighed the cons. The offers were compelling. They created high consumer demand and the site overloads made consumers want it even more. The offers alone gave consumers a reason to care about it, and more importantly, a reason to share it with others (Facebook posts were flooded with people bragging what they scored). Ultimately, it built equity for both the Target and Living Social brands. And, most importantly, doing what promotions do best—motivate behavior.

Social media is hyperactive word of mouth, only there are so many mouths talking you need a way to know how your brand is influencing and who it is reaching. It’s not new news that brands want to connect with consumers. What is new to the speed at which they can track and affect their influence digitally. This media channel is a main conduit for brands to express their voice, promote new products and even tell a larger brand story. It’s not hard to see why and how social media efforts have become the most valuable back-channel way to communicate and build a following. (If your brand isn’t into it, work on that.)

So how do you track all your social media efforts? Who’s talking? How do we keep them talking? With Klout, the current leader in the “social analytics” provider, it all boils down to engagement based on click-throughs, comments, likes, retweets or how often your message is passed along. The number of services they track for you is growing (it now includes the top 10 digital forums, with 3 more coming soon).

Recently celebrities have been using Klout for PR pushes and testing. Brands are also reaching into the system to understand how their audience is listening or if they’re listening at all. They’re taking notes on what topics resonate and using that information to build a stronger brand presence and gaining followers as well as traction in the marketplace as a resource, leader or otherwise. Klout’s easy-to-digest “social analytics” has potential to build smarter partnerships, promotions and more believable categories of influence. Plus, you’ve got to love the dynamic nature of the data. In my opinion, “instant” is the new “ASAP.”

Don’t forget the perks for having influence. Klout Perks are great place for brands to highlight and use those influential talkers directly. It’s kinda like a social media pat on the back from brands to their fans. I’m on board—are you?

Who’s Talking?

Someone needs to spread the message. Called connectors, accelerators and influencers, they have deep and wide social networks and pass along information they care about to others. The key is to tap into the right people for your specific product or service. Here are three types of “go-to” people:

Enthusiast. The stereotypical brand advocate who serves as a passionate brand ambassador.
Local Expert. The know-all about a specific category—car or gadget nut, knows about new restaurants or TV shows.
Jack-of-All-Interest. An interesting know-a-lot vs. an annoying know-it-all.

What Are They Talking About?

First of all, forget everything you learned about traditional brand management. If this process starts by trying to convert a well-crafted brand statement into a word-of-mouth campaign, it won’t be successful. The product or service must be looked at through a different lens.

It’s not what you want to say about your product or service, but what consumers find talkable about it. Finding the relevance in a product or service is crucial. If it’s relevant, the more likely it will be deemed worth sharing. Once something is worth sharing, it has value. High-involvement categories tend to increase information value. The collision of talkability and relevancy becomes the social currency in the message.

Dig deep to understand the consumer. Think about what people like to talk about, why they like to talk, and how an actual conversation might transpire. Remember the book Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus by John Gray? It’s quite appropriate when creating word-of-mouth messages.

When developing word-of-mouth messages directed toward men, think in terms of Guysmanship. Male word-of-mouth triggers tend to be competitive, fact-based and opinionated. Men talk to “show that they know” or “be first.” Look at ESPN or read the sports page—facts and opinions are expressed in sound bites.

For women, it’s all about Fempathy. Female triggers are more empathetic or deal with community building and emotional outreach. They talk “to help” and “to be heard.” And far from sound bites, their conversations are centered on shared experiences and expressed as complete stories. It’s Oprah and Lifetime and their stories of women facing their challenges, from the life-changing to the day-to-day.

So Get to It.

Find the right people to spread the word. Craft the right message that’s talkable and relevant. Activate it using the tactics most appropriate for the topic. There’s a world of technological options; be sure to find the tools that will best seed or spark the conversation. And remember, the true magic lies in the social currency of the idea—it’s what keeps the idea moving to others.

This doesn’t need to be the case.
B2B does not have to be one completely expected, borderline cheesy execution after another. In fact, I would argue B2B could be one of the most creatively innovative spaces in marketing. It offers everything you could want to deliver great creative. A well-defined target. An informed consumer (yes, IBM does not buy something from 3M, a person buys something from another person). Something to sell that is inherently necessary to the audience. And a lot of freedom since no one is really paying attention.

Clear your mind and forget the formula that seems to exist.
Don’t think, “Oh crap, it’s B2B!” Think, “Damn. This could be cool.” Even if there is an assignment you are supposed to answer (print ad, email, website, whatever), ignore it for a moment and think about what you might really want to use as communication vehicles. Too often, marketers want to apply the same things that work for consumer marketing to B2B, with the exception of television, but all this does is continue to nail the box shut.

Do you really think the way to sell a multi-million dollar jet to a Fortune 500 company is with a print ad? Do you really think the subject line of an email will convince Publix to purchase your shelving system? Of course not. But the better question is, what will? B2B is dying for that answer because usually, the products being sold and the contracts being signed are for millions of dollars and multiple years. These are big decisions. Way bigger than which color lipstick should I buy? And creative, innovative and inspiring ideas, brilliantly executed will make those decisions a little easier to make.

Remember, this is an informed audience, regardless of the product. People who purchase real estate for corporations, for example, are not neophytes. They are single minded already. You don’t need to get them into the ‘real estate’ aisle. You need to engage them in your real estate option. You need to engage a person, not a company. Ultimately, you need to motivate that person and I’m pretty sure another trade rag ad with a gleaming high rise and smiling agent is not going to do it. But something different would. Something smarter and more creative would.

B2B marketing only has to suck if you let it. And currently, most people do.

For starters, both Dennis Crowley (co-founder of foursquare) and Josh Williams (founder of Gowalla) think their core features are… well, kinda boring. In their respective panels, each described “location” and “check-ins” as inherently uninteresting. And they’re right. The fact that you are at a venue is horribly uninteresting without some additional context about what’s happening there, who you’re with, or why you’re really there. Locations become relevant and significant to the consumer only when they’re combined with the emotions, memories, and experiences associated with that place. This sentiment was summed up nicely by Crowley: “It’s good that we have a large places database; it’s better that we have an interesting places database.” But even with that additional context, that single data point still isn’t as interesting as a collection of your check-ins over time. In other words, when the context around your location is aggregated and archived over the long run, your check-ins start to tell a story. And speakers across SXSW agreed that for LBSs to grow beyond the geeks and reach the masses, they must make these stories more compelling. To paraphrase Williams, it’s the challenge of making a check-in at Starbucks as exciting as a check-in at the Golden Gate Bridge. Boy, we’ve got some work to do.

Fortunately, the key players have plenty of ideas about how to make this work. Gowalla seems to be planning a service that will help their users easily compile a virtual scrapbook of their memories after going on vacation. If you check in at your home airport, a different airport, then your home airport again, Gowalla might automatically bundle all of your check-ins, updates, and photos that occurred between your departure and return, providing you with a turnkey way to share these memories on sites like Facebook. (Uh, Disney Vacation Club team? This is where you should be paying attention.) Storytelling is even more important for brands that aren’t logically tied to a place, since the only way these brands can interact in the location space is by being a lens that focuses on what’s relevant to their consumers in physical locations. For instance, Crowley gave a hypothetical example in which Pampers could help new parents find playgrounds and parks in their immediate vicinities.

Aside from the hypotheticals, each day seems to bring a new service that is using location to provide enormous utility for consumers. Cabulous is an app (and mobile website) that provides users with a real-time map of available cabs near their current location. As shown in the image at the top of this post, all they need to do is tap on the cab that’s nearest, and the driver will be hailed and provided with the user’s location. There’s also the “Don’t Eat At” app, which foursquare users can add-on if they want to be immediately notified when they’ve checked-in to a restaurant that’s at risk of being shut down for repeated health violations. The more you know… can be a little gross.

So, the stories are coming along, the utility is there, and the base of users is tiptoeing towards critical mass. LBS growth has nowhere to go but up, as long as there’s not a gigantic elephant in the room that could possibly derail their adoption, right? Oh, wait, we almost forgot: the process of checking-in still kinda sucks. Fortunately, everyone in the LBS space is well aware of the problem. Gowalla’s Williams describes check-ins as a band-aid that’s been necessary to get past initial privacy concerns and to generate enough data the make these services relevant. (With foursquare touting half a billion check-ins in the past year, we’d say that’s working.) But even with check-ins being a pain in the butt, users have been trained to understand that check-ins contribute to something useful in the long run, even if there’s not an immediate reward. And if they haven’t understood that before, they understand it now, thanks to the new foursquare interface that we covered pre-SXSW. In addition to helping you explore new places that coincide with your check-in history, check-ins are now accompanied by information like “you haven’t been here in ten months,” or “you just checked in with Kiki – that’s the first time you saw him since you checked-in together at Dark Lord Day,” and other tidbits of information that help you construct your own stories of exploration.

So, if the check-in is only a temporary solution, what’s next? It’s hard to say, but there are some telling signs. The American Express partnership we discussed pre-SXSW is certainly interesting, as it makes this process completely seamless for both consumers and participating marketers. (By the way, if you missed this morning’s update, we’ve got some interesting new information about that partnership.) It’s also becoming increasingly clear that many phones in the next year or two will include NFC capabilities, which could significantly simplify the check-in process. For instance, if foursquare provided venues with “tap here” stickers that included embedded NFC tags, users could check-in just by tapping their phone against that sticker when entering. And if it gets that much simpler to become part of the story of location, we think this space is bound to get a whole lot more interesting.